How Biogenesis Defines The Existence of a Creator II

After a brief discussion about amino acid's chirality, I would like to go deeper into the matter of refuting atheists' statementwhich says, "We are but chemicalaccidentalism". I will try to use the simplest explanation possible to explain this biogenesis conundrum.

The Replication of DNA & Its Constitutions 

We do learn in biology that DNAs have the ability to replicate themselves into two. Replication is one of the most important process in DNA mutation and evolution (others: deletion, translocation, addition, etc.). In Darwinism, mutation is important in keeping the evolution's pace to be always on the go.

The process of DNA replication is undoubtedly significant in both, life and atheism's survival. It answers the questions about how cells merge into something new, about how organisms continue their species' life and about from where extra DNA came from in the cells' division. In accepting this kind of dogma, scientists are putting their disbelief in God in a verge of destruction. 

Eukaryote is a cell of which, its nucleus has DNA strands in it. These DNAs consist of two polymeric strands that will be separated by helicase enzyme during the DNA replication process. Each strand will then become DNA strand's template, and with the help of DNA polymerase III, it will be copied and replace each strands' former strand pair. Thus, two new DNAs are formed.

The Big Question

The thirty-two thousand dollar question suddenly emerged out of this short explanation; which came first in the earliest abiogenesis process: the DNA, of the polymerase? (note: apply your knowledge of chirality in here. It will help). 

If DNA existed first, then how can it be replicated with the absence of polymerase III? Note that DNA replication is not just important in cell's reproduction, it is also quintessential in repairing DNA and revolving it into something more complex. Without polymerase III, the DNA would have dissolved in the high acidity/salinity of the primordial soup and extremely high oxidation level. No life should exist, then.

And if, polymerase III existed first, what use would it had? We have to remember that the sole function of polymerase III-in this case-is to aid DNA on its way to be more complex, organized, multitude and has more quality. Sadly, the existence of role would have not bring any value if the DNA did no exist.

Resolution

The only way to solve this riddle is to BELIEVE that both appeared accidentally, simultaneously; at the very same time, in the very same pond of amino acids. This would be an unbelievable chance or should I say, luck to ever imagine this to happen; let alone imagining how 300 million years later, more than ten million species sprung out of it.

Well, this is after I ignored the difficulty of chirality in DNAs and the DNA repairing predicament (which has similar case to this). Try to put them in the picture, and you will get something called as

the Creator.

Wassalam; wallahu`alam fissawab.